| 375 | 2 | 596 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对物流无人机尚未建立根据应用场景差异开展特性研究的问题,提出一种应用于西南口岸城市末端,即丘陵、山地地形下城郊与乡村地区物流无人机系统。基于物流配送需求,提出一种“路径规划+图像配准投递”的双目标模型。利用A*算法与地面危险区域分类,采用一种保证飞行安全的“跳跃式”路径规划策略;利用“模板+SURF”算法开展主动判断,快速定位卸货点并完成卸货。基于实际场景的验证性试验,建立的路径规划模型在避让山火隐患区域的前提下,较人工配送效率提高50%以上;所建立图像配准模型在耗费14%机载电源的条件下可实现88%的配准准确率,相比传统SIFT算法耗电量增加7%、准确率提高57%;相比Desnet算法耗电量降低18%、准确率降低7%。所设计系统在丘陵与山区区域,以及房屋相似度高的区域可大大提高物流无人机的配送与投递准确度。
Abstract:As the lack of research on scenario-specific characteristics of logistics drones, a last-mile drone model is proposed for application in southwest region, particularly in suburban and rural areas with hilly and mountainous terrains. For the needs of delivery process, the proposed dual-objective model introduces a “path planning + image registration delivery” approach. To ensure flight safety, the model uses the A* algorithm and ground hazard zone classification for “jumping” path planning strategy. The “template + SURF” algorithm is employed for quick localization and efficient unloading. The proposed path planning model has been validated through tests in real scenarios while avoiding the fire hazard area. It demonstrates a more than 50% improvement in efficiency compared to manual delivery. The proposed model can achieve 88% alignment accuracy with 14% of power consumption, which is 7% higher than the traditional SIFT algorithm in terms of power consumption and 57% higher in terms of accuracy. Compared with the Desnet algorithm, it is 18% lower in terms of power consumption and 7% lower in terms of accuracy. The designed system can greatly improve the distribution and delivery accuracy of logistics UAVs in hilly and mountainous areas, as well as in areas with a high degree of housing similarity.
[1] DORLING K,HEINRICHS J,MESSIER G G,et,al.Vehicle Routing Problems for Drone Delivery[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics:Systems,2017,47(1):70-85.
[2] 张启钱,许卫卫,张洪海,等.复杂低空物流无人机路径规划[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2020,46(7):1275-1286.
[3] 周浪.农村电商物流配送“配送车+无人机”路径优化研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2017.
[4] 郭兴海,计明军,温都苏,等.“最后一公里”配送的分布式多无人机的任务分配和路径规划[J].系统工程理论与实践,2021,41(4):946-961.
[5] TORABBEIGI M,LIM G J,KIM S J,et,al.Drone Delivery Scheduling Optimization Considering Payload-induced Battery Consumption Rates[J].Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems,2020,97(3):471-487.
[6] 陈存粮.无人机末端物流配送算法研究[D].西安:西安电子科技大学,2021.
[7] 张洪海,任真苹,冯讴歌,等.城市低空物流无人机飞行计划预先调配[J].系统工程与电子技术,2023,45(9):2802-2811.
[8] 蒋丽,杨露,梁昌勇,等.基于无人机的高层住宅最后“一百米”配送优化[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2022,22(4):236-245.
[9] 李姗,张洪海,刘皞.基于改进元胞自动机算法的物流无人机航路规划[J/OL].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版):1-7[2023-08-10].https://doi.org/10.13245/j.hust.238475.
[10] 刘光才,马寅松,齐福强,等.基于改进A*-人工势场法的城市物流无人机路径规划[J].飞行力学,2022,40(6):16-23.
[11] BEISHENALIEVA A,YOO S J.Multiobjective 3-D UAV Movement Planning in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Bioinspired Swarm Intelligence[J].IEEE Internet of Things Journal,2023,10(9):8096-8110.
[12] LI D C,YIN W P,WONG W E,et,al.Quality-oriented Hybrid Path Planning Based on A* and Q-learning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [J].IEEE Access,2022,10:7664-7674.
[13] FU J Y,SUN G H,YAO W R,et,al.On Trajectory Homotopy to Explore and Penetrate Dynamically of Multi-UAV[J].IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2022,23(12):24008-24019.
[14] 崔昊杨,周坤,张宇,等.电力设备多光谱图像融合及多参量影响的故障渐变规律演化预测研究[J].电网技术,2021,45(1):115-125.
[15] 陈贤儿,梁丹,傅云龙,等.Harris与SURF特征点检测的手术器械机器视觉识别方法[J].传感器与微系统,2023,42(2):118-121.
[16] 高玉潼,雷为民,原玥.复杂环境下基于聚类分析的人脸目标识别[J].计算机科学,2020,47(7):111-117.
[17] 王国杰,胡一凡,张森,等.深度卷积神经网络的遥感影像水体识别[J].遥感学报,2022,26(11):2304-2316.
[18] ADEKANMI A A,SERESTINA V.FCN-based DenseNet Framework for Automated Detection and Classification of Skin Lesions in Dermoscopy Images[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:150377-150396.
基本信息:
中图分类号:V355;TP391.41
引用信息:
[1]杨晓,姚敏.口岸城市末端无人机精准配送与投递模型[J].无线电工程,2024,54(06):1569-1575.
基金信息:
云南省科技厅科技计划项目(202101BA070001-006); 云南省哲学社会科学规划项目(QN202218)~~
2023-09-22
2023-09-22
2023-09-22